Chuckle - even back in prehistoric times we knew the only way to broadband a
dipole is to make it lossy. However the reduction in field strength, while
greater than a typical trap or loading inductor, is not that great. My FS tests
show it to be a dB more or less.
But the mechanical problem of making a permanant connection between coax and
whatever single conductor wire you use for the extensions is the first problem.
They seem to last pretty well in comparitively calm environments, but much
wind plays hob with them.
73 Pete Allen AC5E
> I was just reading REFLECTIONS and found that double bazooka antennas
> are broadband because they are lossy. For maximum generated field
> strength you will do better with a plain dipole, with higher SWR on the
> feedline at the extremes of the band, and a tuner.
>
> Ken N6KB
>
> Jim Miller WB5OXQ wrote:
>
> >I have found that if you have the room for a 1/2 wave dipole that the
> >bazooka made of coax works very well, is quieter than a vertical or a open
> >wire dipole and more broadbanded than either.
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|