TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Jupiter vs IC-746PRO

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Jupiter vs IC-746PRO
From: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:06:05 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks, Rick and Mark and Steve:

I should have mentioned I am a retro guy who likes CW most of all, prefers simplicity in controls, etc., and regards computers as a necessary evil.

However, I do enjoy being in a contest, but I'm not a die-hard, so to speak. I live near a truly serious contester who came close over the weekend to topping the North America all-time score. His team made well over 6000 QSOs. Pre-contest preparation included erection of a 195-foot tower for two stacked 40-meter beams. (You can see his entire set-up at K4JA.com and I can see it on the way to my boat. Unbelievable.)

When I ranked transceivers I thought worked well for me, I was using a Carolina Windom 80. With any of the transceivers I used, K4JA was working stations I could not hear at all. If you want to work really weak signals, there's no substitute for stacked beams on a 195-foot tower! I wonder how my 1953-vintage S-40B would have handled that kind of signal input?

Bottom line: as an unreconstructible retro person, I'm keeping the OMNI VI.

73 es tnx agn,
John, W3ULS

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TenTec] Jupiter vs IC-746PRO, John Rippey <=