To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Jupiter vs IC-746PRO |
From: | John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:06:05 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Thanks, Rick and Mark and Steve: I should have mentioned I am a retro guy who likes CW most of all, prefers simplicity in controls, etc., and regards computers as a necessary evil. However, I do enjoy being in a contest, but I'm not a die-hard, so to speak. I live near a truly serious contester who came close over the weekend to topping the North America all-time score. His team made well over 6000 QSOs. Pre-contest preparation included erection of a 195-foot tower for two stacked 40-meter beams. (You can see his entire set-up at K4JA.com and I can see it on the way to my boat. Unbelievable.) When I ranked transceivers I thought worked well for me, I was using a Carolina Windom 80. With any of the transceivers I used, K4JA was working stations I could not hear at all. If you want to work really weak signals, there's no substitute for stacked beams on a 195-foot tower! I wonder how my 1953-vintage S-40B would have handled that kind of signal input? Bottom line: as an unreconstructible retro person, I'm keeping the OMNI VI. 73 es tnx agn, John, W3ULS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] FCC has posted NPRM for BPL, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO, Rick Westerman |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] FCC has posted NPRM for BPL, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Jupiter SENSITIVITY, Allan Henry Kaplan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |