TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Old Vs. New Technology

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Old Vs. New Technology
From: Steve Weber <kd9bo@mac.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:07:06 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The recent discussion about the old Omni's started me thinking. (doesn't happen all that much, but that's a whole 'nother subject)

How does an Omni B or C stack up against the present day almost-but-not-quite-top-of-the-line rigs such as the Jupiter? I'm not talking about bells & whistles or even what is expected in a rig these days such as multiple VFOs, general coverage, auto notch etc. Just a rig that is user friendly, has a clean signal, can dig out the weak ones and is low noise and easy on the ears.

Any thoughts?
--
Steve Weber


No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

*******************************

Hey spammers - Harvesting email addresses? Don't overlook these guys!

FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell: mpowell@fcc.gov
FCC Commissioner Kathleen Q. Abernathy: kabernat@fcc.gov
FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps: mcopps@fcc.gov
FCC Commissioner Kevin J. Martin: kjmweb@fcc.gov
FCC Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein: jadelste@fcc.gov

US Postal Service: customer@email.usps.gov
Fraud Watch: fraudinfo@psinet.com
Federal Trade Commission: consumerline@ftc.gov
Federal Trade Commission: uce@ftc.gov
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>