To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] AOR voice modem (was bandwidth use) |
From: | "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Sun, 15 Feb 2004 01:27:58 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
The AOR digital voice gadget is an interesting but pricey toy at this point. There are a few technical problems as were mentioned in the QST review which I will get to in a moment, but first, the social aspects of HF and why they will prevent digital voice from ever becoming more than an interesting niche mode, for the time being. Like it or not, HF operating for an awful lot of hams is to some degree a competitive activity. Many hams have spent tens of thousands of dollars (yen, pounds etc.) on the all too familiar hardware inside and out, so that they may win, have the Big Signal, and be King of The Band. An awful lot of hams get drawn into the desire to dominate, especially in contesting and chasing dx. Now, to some extent, given that digital signals are easier to copy and decode if transmitted with lower power and poorer antennas, here is something that levels the playing field, that renders those kilowatts and stacked beams not quite as necessary. Many hams operating a lot of analog phone will have none of it. I am not attempting to take sides on this--I'm merely stating the status quo. For many, the nature of the hobby is to go in the opposite direction and if possible, _increase_ the number of ways one may gain an advantage. Technically, at this point, the digital device requires receipt of a sync stream at the start of each transmission. Besides introducing a cumbersome delay eliminating rapid fire roundtable type qsos, if this sync stream is lost at the receiver, the listening op has to listen to data, until the talking op finally lets go of the PTT button. Better hope you don't have a monolog operator on the other end. Because of the delay, all the steps needed each time someone transmits, to decode the voice, the current setup would I think, encourage brick on mic button AM type transmissions. Hams used to quick analog sideband interjections and roundtable frivolity, made possible by solid state switching and amp keying loops will find that this sloooooooooows evvvvvvvery thiiiiiiiiiing dooooooooown. Hopefully the technical problems can be worked out. But in the near future, digital voice will probably be a mode enjoyed mainly by people already using other digital modes on HF. Rob Atkinson K5UJ _________________________________________________________________ Plan your next US getaway to one of the super destinations here. http://special.msn.com/local/hotdestinations.armx _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Pegasus Erratic SWR readings, Carl Moreschi |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Detailed Argonaut V Review on eHam.net, jcasey |
Previous by Thread: | [Orion] orion serial port, HeathlinerSB |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Detailed Argonaut V Review on eHam.net, jcasey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |