TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] AOR voice modem (was bandwidth use)

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] AOR voice modem (was bandwidth use)
From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 01:27:58 +0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The AOR digital voice gadget is an interesting but pricey toy at this point.
There are a few technical problems as were mentioned in the QST review which
I will get to in a moment, but first, the social aspects of HF and why they will
prevent digital voice from ever becoming more than an interesting niche mode,
for the time being.


Like it or not, HF operating for an awful lot of hams
is to some degree a competitive activity. Many hams have spent tens of thousands
of dollars (yen, pounds etc.) on the all too familiar hardware inside and out, so that
they may win, have the Big Signal, and be King of The Band. An awful lot of hams
get drawn into the desire to dominate, especially in contesting and chasing dx.
Now, to some extent, given that digital signals are easier to copy and decode
if transmitted with lower power and poorer antennas, here is something that levels
the playing field, that renders those kilowatts and stacked beams not quite as necessary.
Many hams operating a lot of analog phone will have none of it. I am not attempting to
take sides on this--I'm merely stating the status quo. For many, the nature of the
hobby is to go in the opposite direction and if possible, _increase_ the number of
ways one may gain an advantage.


Technically, at this point, the digital device requires receipt of a sync stream at the start of each transmission. Besides introducing a cumbersome delay eliminating rapid fire roundtable type qsos, if this sync stream is lost at the receiver, the listening op has to listen to data, until the talking op finally lets go of the PTT button. Better hope you don't have a monolog operator on the other end. Because of the delay, all the steps needed each time someone transmits, to decode the voice, the current setup would I think, encourage brick on mic button AM type transmissions. Hams used to quick analog sideband interjections and roundtable frivolity, made possible by solid state switching and amp keying loops will find that this sloooooooooows evvvvvvvery thiiiiiiiiiing dooooooooown.
Hopefully the technical problems can be worked out. But in the near future, digital voice will probably be a mode enjoyed mainly by people already using other digital modes on HF.


Rob Atkinson
K5UJ

_________________________________________________________________
Plan your next US getaway to one of the super destinations here. http://special.msn.com/local/hotdestinations.armx


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TenTec] AOR voice modem (was bandwidth use), Rob Atkinson, K5UJ <=