TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Another reason for PTT CW

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Another reason for PTT CW
From: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:28:26 EST
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Guys,
I like the fact that TT (Thanks Scott!) has excellant QSK.

HOWEVER, I WOULD LIKE TO ALSO HAVE THE OPTION OF PTT, BECAUSE, I HATE TO HEAR 
ALL OF THE DARN BAND NOISE (OR JUST THE RX COMING ON) IN BETWEEN WORDS!

Doesn't anyone else care about that?

Yes, I have the QSK delay up to 100%, but it still isn't alwaya long enough 
to prevent the RX from coming on. AND even if it was a little longer ( Easy for 
them to do?) then when you are ready for RX you have to wait for the QSK 
delay to timeout.

This of course has nothing to do with linears or PC's or contesting. 
JUST TO ENJOY CW QSO's

I just did some CW work this AM, the QSK is very irritating to me.

Scott, is it really that hard to offer the choice of PTT or QSK?

Am I the only one that is concerned about this?

Thanks Guys, Learning a lot here.

Lee, KC9CDT ( WA8OJC when 16)
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>