TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RE: BPL

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE: BPL
From: Bob Janney <rjanney@optonline.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 18:53:50 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Don't worry Don,
   The FCC is already poised to destroy the AM Broadcast band as
well.......IBOC .

73's
Bob WB3EBN
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don Rasmussen" <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 6:08 PM
Subject: [TenTec] RE: BPL


> Hi Guys,
>
> Ever wonder why the lower limit for BPL was set
> *above* the 160 meter band? They don't want to ruin
> the AM broadcast band, my guess.
>
> I already have a Phonex variation of BPL in my
> neighborhood and it's not enjoyable, just tolerable at
> the existing limit. And if they raise the radiation
> limits, 160 meters is not a bad band, not bad at all.
> I just don't know if there is room for all of us
> there. Imagine - only one clean HF band.
>
> de WB8YQJ/6
>
> [TenTec] Fw: BPL
> from [42hotrodz] [Permanent Link][Original]
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>