To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation |
From: | w9oj@peoplepc.com (Mike Manship) |
Date: | Mon Aug 11 19:56:50 2003 |
>Remember that it took ICOM three generations of new radios to get an >acceptable result. 756, 756 Pro, 756 Pro II. By this line of reasoning we can assume that Ten Tec never got the Omni series to be acceptable because there were so many different variations (545, 545B,546,546B,546C,562,563 and 564) then they just gave up and dropped the line entirely. Was the 564 finally "acceptable" ? (That depends upon whom you ask). 73 de Mike W9OJ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation/Dragonball, Jim Reid |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation/Dragonball, Ken Brown |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation, George, W5YR |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation/Dragonball, AC5E@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |