Eric, I once challenged ARRL on "bauds" and they sent me a copy of some ITU
spec that used that term. They argued that if it is proper to use "Ohms" and
"volts" then it is equally proper to use "bauds."
Annoys me, too, and I never use the term. Specifying the bit rate gives an
unambiguous definition of what you are saying. Depending upon the person,
"baud(s)" could mean anything.
I, too, lose patience with those who think that everything that goes between
a transmitter and an antenna must be either a tuner, a transmission line or
a balun.
Gripe mode off . . .
73/72, George
Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13QE
"In the 57th year and it just keeps getting better!"
<mailto:w5yr@att.net>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] dbm and VU units of audio measurement
> At 02:14 PM 7/30/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >OOPS now I am on a roll.
>
> Yeah, you were!
>
> We all have our issues... the ones that get under my skin are people
> who use baud and bits per second interchangably, and the ARRL's horrific
> "bauds," people who call the power delivered to most homes "2 phase,"
> and -- as an SWL -- people who have "a 40 foot longwire antenna connected
> to a balun" when they have a 40 foot random wire antenna connected to
> a matching transformer.
>
> To really pop the fuse, substitute the product name "magnetic longwire
balun"
> for "balun."
>
> ....now *I* am on a roll...
>
>
> >73
> >Bill wa4lav
|