LARRY GREENBERG, N5BEA wrote:
> The filtering is minimal. There is no way to gage the amount of
> unwanted data enter the Linux based servers. They are resistant to
> infections but when infected, fixes are usually non-existent. This
> means hard disk formatting and redundant systems to facilitate minimum
> down time at xx thousand dollars per hour.
I'm no Linux bigot. I run Solaris and W2K as well :-)
With appropriate logging and interpretation of the logs. Virtually all
of which may be
automated, there is nothing that can happen to a Unix and little to a
W2K system
that the administrator may not uncover and fix.
Whether he can or not is another story.
Large hardware investment does not imply adequate administration...
| Linux is a great system. I use it for many operations. I believe
Mapper was tremendous, the answer to all problems | when Sperry
developed it back in the 80's . Do you recall the name of the
Operating System developed for DEC?
Which one?
VMS, Ultrix, one of the multitude of DOS's or RTOS's ???
Personally I like BSD unix for network operations.
-t
|