Yes it does still have all the DSP stuff of its own,
but the 12KHZ signal that is provided on the back
panel is before any of the A to D and DSP of the
RX-320 itself.
However the DSP in the RX 320 will still have an
effect on whatever analog AGC action that there may
be. If I recall correctly a large part of the AGC of
the RX-320 is handled in the DSP itself and only very
strong signals will affect any of the analog AGC
action, anyone know if this totally correct? What this
means that the 12KHz signal will probably not be 100%
AGC stabilized but instead for only the very strong
signals.
Duane
N9DG
--- Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> wrote:
> I thought the D was a regular RX320 with an IF out
> added.
> Still had the DSP stuff inside.
>
> 73
> Bill wa4lav
>
>
> At 02:22 PM 6/9/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >That is exactly what the RX-320D is.
> >
> >http://www.tentec.com/TT320.htm
> >
> >It outputs the 12KHz IF signal on a newly provided
> >jack on the back panel. Its main limitation is that
> it
> >will only provide for 2.5KHz tuning steps.
> >
> >Duane
> >N9DG
> >
> >
> >--- Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> wrote:
> > > I wonder if Ten Tec could produce a RX320 with
> IF
> > > output only to send to
> > > sound card and not have the DSP stuff and audio
> for
> > > much less than the RX320. PC DSP IF is practical
> now
> > > up to 15 or 20 KHz.
> > >
> > > 73
> > > Bill wa4lav
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
|