=0D
When I did the A/B test with a couple of rigs a few years back, I used a=
T
connector and then had both rigs on at the same time, on the same antenna=
=2E I
felt like this was an easier way then manually switching back and forth. =
And
I felt like it was an accurate way of doing the A/B test. Of course, I've
been wrong before too. You definitly wouldn't want to key a transmitter w=
ith
this configuration, but I felt like it was a decent way to compare receiv=
ers
=0D
=0D
Mike - K9MI=0D
=0D
=0D
-------Original Message-------=0D
=0D
From: Scott Rosenfeld [N7JI]=0D
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 8:47:52 PM=0D
To: tentec@contesting.com=0D
Subject: [TenTec] P.S. on A/B testing=0D
=0D
I didn't mean to poopoo A/B testing altogether. As I said, I've done =0D
probably hundreds of hours of it, listening for rx and audio qualities, =0D
MDS, ability to receive despite horrific conditions, etc.=0D
=0D
When you get to a problem is trying to copy the same station on more than=
=0D
one radio. If you can't have both receivers listening to the same signal =
=0D
at the same time, you end up with possible variation in the signal being =
=0D
received that you simple can't control. Yes, after flipping back and =0D
forth a few dozen times, it will all even out statistically, but if the =0D
two receivers are really, really close, and you want a definitive answer =
=0D
as to which is better at hearing weak signals, a stable signal source is =
=0D
truly the way to go.=0D
=0D
(and nature is never truly predictable :)=0D
=0D
-- =0D
Scott Rosenfeld ARS N7JI=0D
541-684-9970 Eugene, OR Land o' much rain=0D
If you find me on the air, I'm probably in my car=0D
ham@w3eax.umd.edu http://w3eax.umd.edu/~ham=0D
=0D
_______________________________________________=0D
TenTec mailing list=0D
TenTec@contesting.com=0D
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec=0D
=2E=20
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/related
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
image/gif
---
|