TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Re: TenTec digest, Vol 1 #729 - 11 msgs

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Re: TenTec digest, Vol 1 #729 - 11 msgs
From: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst)
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:06:44 -0800 (PST)
The 95S-1A was one of the three radios at Dayton 1997
that caught my intrest. The other two were the RX-320,
and the Kachina 505, I now have two of the 3, .....
hmmm could a 95S-1a be far behind??? ;). I couldn't
help but be intriqued by a multi kilobuck direct
conversion rig. 

Duane
N9DG

--- Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca> wrote:
> <<...Tayloe quadrature mixer direct to the A/D and
> DSP...>>
> 
> The Rockwell-Collins 95S-1A receiver uses an
> image-reject I/Q mixer driving
> the ADC at zero IF.
> 
> http://www.wa3key.com/95s1.html
> 
> Best 73,
> Adam, VA7OJ/AB4OJ
> North Vancouver, BC, Canada
> http://www.qsl.net/ab4oj/
> Icom FAQ site:
> http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:tentec-admin@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of John Buck
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 19:44
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] Re: TenTec digest, Vol 1 #729 - 11
> msgs
> 
> 
> Jim,
> 
> OUCH!  True but nasty.  George will now have to try
> to recover.  Watch out.
> 
> I think an interesting alternative approach is a
> Tayloe quadrature mixer
> direct to the A/D and DSP.  It seems to have
> excellent linearity and
> dynamic range and even acts as a very narrow band
> front end filter.  In
> this case, the roofing filter can possibly be a
> digital brick wall low
> pass operating at the high side of the received
> bandwidth.  No other
> stages are required except the 4X VFO and divider
> and some gain before
> the A/D.
> 
> Aloha,
> John KH7T
> 
> Jim, you wrote:
> 
> The argument that filters in the front end of a
> heterodyning
> receiver are not needed if "everything" is
> absolutely linear
> is just not so.  The mixer is not linear,  so an
> image reject
> filter is NEEDED.  And it might as well contribute
> to the
> narrowing of the spectrum of energy to be handled by
> the entire following system as well as doing the job
> of image
> and spurious signal product rejection.  To imply
> that the use
> of narrow,  muti-pole crystal lattice filters
> following the first
> mixer is a "cover up"  for poor linear design
> characteristics
> of the front end or following stages,  is just not
> being technically
> honest.
> 
> Lots of words,  hope this is understandable.
> 
> 73,  Jim  KH7M
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>