TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Re: Orion Concern

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Re: Orion Concern
From: mandolinist@interlync.com (Gary Smith)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 18:10:03 -0500
Dayton was interesting for me as always but I spent 
more time talking with other "shoppers" about the gear 
in front of us than I usually do, I'm usually trying to find 
that "rare oddity" that will make my trip "paid for".

I wanted to talk with the Ten Tec staff but there were so 
many people there the times I got to the booth that I 
decided to not ask questions but listen instead. 

I thought the Orion looked quite functional and easy to 
maneuver about. It wasn't crammed with small buttons 
that are wont to accidentally bump nor was there a lot of 
wasted space.

As to the size of the name "Orion", I personally thought 
it was a tad larger than I would have placed on it. I find 
the Corsair II logo about perfect on my rig. However, I 
can't imagine anyone willing to spend that much money 
on a rig being turned away just because  of the name 
size and placement. 

If it's aesthetics one wants, the Ten-Tec line never has 
been #1 in this  regard. My suspicion is most of the 
people on this list got into Ten-Tec for some 
functionality either they discovered personally or were 
led to TT by someone whose taste they respected long 
ago & preferred the TT functionality.

I find it somewhat amusing to read the intensity some 
people place on color of the screen, body &  Logo. To 
me, an ideal CW waveform, spectral purity, effective 
noise reduction, smooth QSK,  selectivity & sensitivity 
are what really counts. The reason I  stick with my 
Corsair II is because it does what I want & when I  want 
it. Memories are fine but except for very rare occasions, 
I don't need more than one memory & my VFO allows 
me that  latitude. 

If the specs on the Orion prove to be as TT claims & I  
suspect they will be, I believe TT will capture the most 
demanding of hams looking for the top of the  line 
functionality including myself. I've been waiting for the 
DSP that TT has finally gotten around to. 

As to color in the display, that would be pretty and 
probably a selling point for those on the edge of 
purchase. Were I in charge of the  design I might well 
seriously consider putting in such a  display and provide 
a user swichable monochrome display of the user's 
choice of colors. With a color display, that would be an 
easy option & this way there could be no complaint.
 
I personally prefer a rig with some heft. I always liked 
my old Signal one for this matter. Compact rigs are fine 
but I have always found larger ones to be easier for me  
to use. 

FWIW, I believe TT is doing a  tough job, providing an 
unusually high functioning radio to the private market at  
a price that is pennies on the dollar compared to what 
commercial entities and the government must pay for 
equivalent quality. 

If someone insists on flashy appearance to make them 
buy, the rice burners will certainly lead the pack as they 
always have. If someone insists on substance of their 
transmit and receive quality, Ten-Tec appears to 
continue on being the leader.

There will always be some who buy the name for 
whatever reason. Once a Mercedes owner, always a 
Mercedes owner. Same with Ten-Tec, Kenwood, Icom 
& Yaesu. There will be those who are tired of having 15 
buttons on their rig they never use and want to try 
something that is simpler with better specs/effective 
functionality than their old rig. I suspect as our ranks 
continue to grey, this will become more and more an 
important choice in buying the "next" radio.

Cheers,

Gary
KA1J


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>