Sorry, Ron, but I left out the most important tip about "on air" audio
tests, or any tests for that matter.
If you want comparisons among A, B, and C, don't be reluctant to switch
names and lie in the middle of the test - this imparts another "blind"
dimension that is more likely to yield a valid result. If the same
impressions/reports follow the same mic even though you give it different
names at different times, then you know that folks are paying attention to
what they hear and not trying to play three-card Monte with you!
72/73/oo, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13qe
Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 56th year and it just keeps getting better!
QRP-L 1373 NETXQRP 6 SOC 262 COG 8 FPQRP 404 TEN-X 11771 I-LINK 11735
Icom IC-756PRO #02121 Kachina #91900556 IC-765 #02437
All outgoing email virus-checked by Norton Anti-Virus 2002
Ronald Hands wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the comments about microphones and microphone
> tests.
> I learned one thing after my first test session on the air:
> never identify what you're using. Just name them A, B and C and
> let the results speak for themselves without any brand name attached.
> George, W5YR, suggested listening to myself on another
> receiver. I'll try it, again, but I can hardly recognize my own
> voice, even when I hear it tape recorded. I'm told it's quite
> bassy. Doesn't sound that way to me.
> Anyway, it's been an interesting little diversion and I've
> been pleased to get many favorable reports on the Corsair audio.
> They came as somewhat of a surprise -- somehow I didn't think
> of the Corsair as a phone rig :-)
|