> Take a look at the QST review QSK 'scope trace photo of Kachina. It
> truncates the CW dots to an extreme degree. Not so with Ten-Tec.
The Kachina's CW waveform isn't too band if you ignore the leading edge of
the first element in a string. Like many radios, a sharp power spike is
evident due to ALC overshoot. What I found is that if you decreased the ALC
setting on the software, the power spike would disappear, but it was a pain
to find the ALC "sweet spot" for every band.
The worst aspect of the Kachina's T/R keying is that one cannot get around
the noisy keying relay. They could have used a small reed relay like most
Ten-Tecs. It's makes for an incredible racket in "full QSK." Further, the
Kachina's QSK is really semi-break-in. In full QSK, receive audio between
keyed elements completely disappears even at slow keying speed.
I never understood their amp interface either. As an option, they supplied
an external relay housed in a DB-15 connector to key an external amp. Yet,
the transistor used to drive the optional relay was rated at 1.0 amp @ 160
Vceo. Like the Pegasus, this transistor used as an open collector is good
enough for keying most any amp that does not use an AC key line. But, as a
manufacturer, you have to cover yourself from any type of interfacing that
is possible by the end-user. Dry contact closures with a relay is the safe
way out.
I enjoyed mine while I had it. But ironically, I sold it when I purchased
the Pegasus. The Kachina's built-in CW keyboard mode is a joy to use. But,
the user interface on the Pegasus is so much better and with the N4PY
control software it's even better.
Also, take a look at the ARRL's measured performance specs of the Jupiter in
the most recent issue of QST, particularly phase noise and IP2. Performance
is actually quite good.
-Paul, W9AC
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
|