TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] TT Titan and other TT QSK amp issues

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] TT Titan and other TT QSK amp issues
From: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A Calvin)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:33:17 -0600
Why not just set your rig to "slow QSK"  (or slow break-in).

        73,  Duane  AC5AA

On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:52:38 -0800 (PST) agtaylor@llnl.gov writes:
> 
> I have had a TT Titan amp for about 4 years now and find it to be a
> solid reliable amp with great QSK. Of late I have been doing more 
> contesting than previously and find that I fear for the vacuum 
> relay
> when used at 35+/- wpm in an extended contesting situation. I have
> devised a simple scheme that would allow the PTT output from my
> logging program (TRLog / 486 PC) to key the amp on rather than 
> follow
> the actual transmitted signal, etc. In that way, an outgoing CQ
> (and there tend to be plenty of them) , through which one is not
> really likely to listen anyway, is not going to add to the wear/tear 
> on
> the vacuum relay. It is not in final form: basically I have worked
> out suitable logic for my particular needs and operating 
> environment.
> The vacuum relays aren't noiseless either, so quieting the shack
> while operating is also an issue.
> 
> The question for this reflector is this. Has this sort of thing 
> been
> done before? If so I could, perhaps, benefit from their work.
> 
> K7GT  Allan
> 
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
> Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
> 
> 


Duane A. Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
ac5aa@juno.com -or- ac5aa@earthlink.net
Day:  dacalvin@us.ibm.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>