[TenTec] Reciever comparisons

To:	<tentec@contesting.com>
Subject:	[TenTec] Reciever comparisons
From:	k8do@email.msn.com (k8do)
Date:	Wed, 3 Jan 2001 08:31:39 -0500

Sensitivity is cheap... A 30 cent FET will give you all the sensitivity your
ears can handle... Selectivity, stability, accuracy, intercept levels,
harmonic rejection, IF rejection, audio fidelity , are expensive...

Denny




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[TenTec] Reciever comparisons, nw4p@martha.xtn.net [TenTec] Reciever comparisons, Carl Moreschi [TenTec] Reciever comparisons, k8do <= [TenTec] Reciever comparisons, nw4p@martha.xtn.net [TenTec] Reciever comparisons, <w8keb@1st.net (Ken & Linda Burrough) [TenTec] Reciever comparisons, Bob Mauro - PeopleNet [TenTec] Receiver comparisons, Ken Kinyon - W7TS [TenTec] Reciever comparisons, Jim Lowman [TenTec] Reciever comparisons, Mike Hyder -N4NT-

Previous by Date:	[TenTec] Reciever comparisons, Carl Moreschi
Next by Date:	[TenTec] Reciever comparisons, nw4p@martha.xtn.net
Previous by Thread:	[TenTec] Reciever comparisons, Carl Moreschi
Next by Thread:	[TenTec] Reciever comparisons, nw4p@martha.xtn.net
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]