TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Fw: [AMPS] 3cx800a7 response from Eimac

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Fw: [AMPS] 3cx800a7 response from Eimac
From: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell)
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 04:12:50 -0400
The issue, TTers, is simple.  The escalating cost of the 3CX800A7
forced Ten-Tec to stop production of the Titan I.  The tubes were
readily available but the cost just drove the amp beyond profitability
based on the initial quoted price for a Titan I.  That's just too bad.
The Titan I amplifier has to be the greatest amp ever built.  The only
real reason to discontinue it would be the cost to produce it. 

The Titan II with its self-contained power supply is a disaster, IMHO.
Try lifting 93 pounds of amp onto your operating table.  Oops, need
a stiff knee over there, one here.  Uh, maybe one in the middle!

The issue here, TTers, is liability.  Put a power supply on the floor,
an RF deck at the operating position and run a B+ between them.
Maybe a cat or dog or kid could chew on that B+ line and get some
sort of a surprise.  Not likely, but that's a manufacturer's concern.

de Joe, aa4nn

<RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net> writes:
> 
> I wonder what Tentec has to say about this.  I'd suspect that it is a
> warranty issue vs price issue between the Eimac product and the 
> user. As I recall Eimac limits its warranty to the purchaser and does
> not have a pass-through warranty to the end user.
> 
> 73
> Bob K4TAX
> 
> 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>