TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] New Receiver

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] New Receiver
From: SEWATKINS@dgs.state.va.us (Sherrill WATKINS)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 08:37:15 -0400
Ten Tec would probably sell more receivers if they included the synchrous AM 
detector.  (They would probably sell more transceivers
if they did the same.)  At least I would probably buy one to replace my 30 year 
old Drake SPR-4.  In this day and age, a short wave
receiver without a synchrous a.m. detector is like a car without airconditiong  
or an am-fm radio; who really wants it?   Also, a few
years ago the ARRL did an evaluation of the Watkins-Johnson professional 
reciever and rated it a real dog. The results of their
evaluation were  published in QST. -Sherrill W.  k4own

>>> "Kirk Yarina" <k_yarina@hotmail.com> 05/17/00 08:24PM >>>

That depends what you mean by reasonable - it's $3950.00 at Universal Radio
( http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/commrxvr/0340.html ) .  It's got
the synchronous AM that hasn't made it into the RX-320 yet...

Kirk, KC8MMU


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Weingaertner" <weingaertner@nac.net>
>
> While we're looking at the Pegasus FP, take a look at the RX-340
> receiver. It looks like those super expensive military/commercial
> r3eceivers that Watkins-Johnson and Collins make. Looks like a
> real radio, too, with nice specs. If the price is right, I'd
> replace my ICOM R-71A with a TT RX-340.
>
> 73 all, Bob WB2VUF

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>