>From jmlowman@ix.netcom.com Thu Apr 20 12:25:12 2000
Received: from truserve.com (king.truserve.com [208.142.211.10])
by contesting.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA26960
for <tentec@contesting.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:25:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 18089 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2000 16:25:38 -0000
Received: from soho.truserve.com (HELO default) (208.142.211.191)
by king.truserve.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2000 16:25:38 -0000
Message-ID: <38FF20EA.20BD@ames.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 10:23:22 -0500
From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@ames.net>
Reply-To: geraldj@ames.net
Organization: Gerald N. Johnson
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tentec@qth.net, tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [TenTec] Pegasus - monitor noise - still]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------AED5467424"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------AED5467424
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Not my Pegasus. I'm happy with my Corsair II.
73, Jerry, K0CQ
--------------AED5467424
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: <ko4qc@mindspring.com>
Delivered-To: geraldj@ames.net
Received: (qmail 22079 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2000 09:18:41 -0000
Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (207.69.200.148)
by king.truserve.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2000 09:18:41 -0000
Received: from dad (user-37kaee7.dialup.mindspring.com [207.69.57.199])
by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA01746
for <geraldj@ames.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 05:18:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: ko4qc@mindspring.com
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20000420051924.007dbd80@mindspring.com>
X-Sender: ko4qc@mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 05:19:24 -0400
To: geraldj@ames.net
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Pegasus - monitor noise - still
In-Reply-To: <38FDCCD0.5279@ames.net>
References: <200004190202.WAA22935@contesting.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I agree.Returning the Pegasus will not correct the problem.I run a Pegasus
within 3 ft of 3 computers/monitors with no problem.I have,in the past,had
other monitors interfere with Kenwood and Yaesu HF rigs.It cant be blamed
on the radio.
BTW...how is your Pegasus grounded?
Joel,KO4QC
At 10:12 AM 4/19/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>The world's rules, especially the EC rules on monitor emissions have
>toughened since '92. A far more modern monitor test specification should
>make for a much quieter monitor. EC rules are tougher than FCC rules.
>
>If its monitor leakage, the monitor will still upset any other radio if
>you have the monitor running while using the radio until you quiet the
>monitor.
>
>73, Jerry, K0CQ
--------------AED5467424--
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|