TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss
From: GeneN8KUA@aol.com (GeneN8KUA@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:02:50 EST
Now for a while I had both an OMNI V and a 930S.  Like Keith, I found the 
Ten-Tec to be a bit easier to listen to.  During the time I had both, I found 
it really hard to find the busy cw condx that should have let the T-T shine.  
I personally found I enjoyed the OMNI a bit more (in spite of the 
less-than-smoth QSK in split mode), though I knew I would miss some of the 
930S features like the variable sidetone and audio bandpass filters.  And it 
was really a close call.  My 930S had INRAD 2.1 SSB filters and a pair of 
INRAD 400 Hz cw filters and (I think) an INRAD AM filter of some sort.  Not 
being willing to have one rig idle, I sold the 930S and accessories to 
Keith's friend Frank in Vermont.  Keith, is this perchance the radio you had 
over the weekend?

73,

Gene, N8KUA
Baltimore, MD (except about 1 wk/mo then Arlington, TX)

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>