TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Re: Keyer selection

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Re: Keyer selection
From: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 21:32:05 -0600
It might help to fully define terms since some may be thinking
"non-iambic" means single paddle, or using the single paddle technique
even when using dual paddles - i.e, not "squeeze" keying where both
contacts are closed at the same time.  I can send full iambic squeeze
mode if I think about it.  In fact, CQ de AC5AA is very conducive to
iambic squeeze keying.  But, I have keyer memories for that, and use them
faithfully.  When it comes to conversational mode, I guess I used a bug
for too many years as I just slap the Bencher paddles instead of squeeze.
 

As for which keyer is "best", I've found that the Logikey is very
forgiving in the sense that I never get extra dit's at the end of
characters while I consistently do with some of the MFJ keyers.  Both are
supposed to be operating in the same mode, so I can't explain the
difference. I thought I had lost it a year after coming back to ham radio
and I still couldn't send well.  Then I tried the Logikey and all has
been well since (er, uh, at least when I make mistakes, it's because it
was my fault!).

        73,  Duane


Duane A. Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
ac5aa@juno.com -or- ac5aa@earthlink.net
Day:  dacalvin@us.ibm.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>