Although I do not see these rather bizarre conditions as "show-stoppers,"
if the change is as easy to implement as Malcolm suggests, perhaps Ten-Tec
will consider the change in a forthcoming code drop. Nevertheless, I am
still amazed at how stable the system software is after only a few minor
code releases.
-Paul, W9AC
----------
> From: M. Clark <rudder@gulfcoast.net>
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE: Pegasus ATTN button
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 10:19 AM
>
>
> At 08:44 AM 12/8/99 -0600, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >Or, it could be (and I suspect this is the case) that TT wanted to be
able
> >to provide the software to people thinking about the Pegasus so they
could
> >see how it looks on-screen. They would need to run it without a Pegasus
> >and not get lockups or error responses. (I'm purely guessing here...)
> >
> > 73, Duane AC5AA
>
> That's easy to do. The failure mode doesn't have to have any effect on
> what the user sees. All it has to be is an internal flag that indicates
> that the radio has failed to respond to a poll. When the PC does get a
> poll response it simply resends all the current settings to the radio and
> resets the flag. At least that's how I think it should work, and I
assume
> that's what TenTec did--somehow forgetting the Attn command.
>
> 73, Malcolm WX4YZ
>
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|