TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Response to Jim re: CW

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Response to Jim re: CW
From: caitlyn@netferrets.net (Caitlyn Martin)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 13:36:59 -0500
Hi, Jim,


> I agree with most of what you said but I still beleive that to work weak
signal
> under trying conditions you can't beat CW. I have not used the PSK mode
but from
> what I have read it may be a good contender.

What you say about CW here is absolutely true, and I am not dismissing it as
a valid mode for hams to use.  It is a wonderful part of the hobby *if* you
enjoy it, and useful to those who partake in the mode.  I just don't believe
it is the absolute yardstick for judging who has a right to call him or
herself a ham, and I do not believe in putting down those who choose not to
deal with it.  I am not anti-CW by any means.

73,
Caity
KU4QD






--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>