TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Re: Pegasus/RX320 RCVR Commonality

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Re: Pegasus/RX320 RCVR Commonality
From: kc0dxf@yahoo.com (Robert Wooldridge)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
I have thought the same thing.  I would think that any
kind of re-use of parts and designs would be
economically beneficial.  There does seem to be some
slight differences in the receiver specs.  How
significant are these?

--- Vin Legare <vin@midmaine.com> wrote:
> 
> I've been thinking about getting an TT RX320.  In
> the process I note that the
> specs for both the Pegasus and RX320 are almost the
> same ... for the features
> that the RX320 has.  Has anyone had the opportunity
> to compare them?  Would be
> interested in your comments.  With the excellent
> review that the 320 has rcv'd
> it looks like TT expanded their 320 and added xmtr
> boards plus sw enhancements
> to achieve the Pegasus.
> 
> Vin  W1TUJ
> 
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:              
> http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: 
> tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                
> owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search:                  
> http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> 
> 


===
-Bob Wooldridge KC0DXF
-Web Mail: kc0dxf@yahoo.com
-Web: http://www.qsl.net/kc0dxf/
-See Also: http://www.anet-stl.com/~mcsg/
-Via HAM radio repeaters in St. Louis: 146.85, 442.10
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>