Is the cascading question a bit tricky?
The OMNI V may have been the first radio with the 9 MHz IF, but didn't the
older OMNI C let the user cascade filters ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Hodsdon <k7kj@teleport.com>
To: zeitler@ibm.net <zeitler@ibm.net>
Cc: tentec@contesting.com <tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thursday, August 19, 1999 6:23 PM
Subject: [Fwd: [TenTec] Paragon I CPU "upgrade"]
>
>
>
>zeitler@ibm.net wrote:
>
>> Brian, Clark, et al,
>> I am curious.......What does the Ghiel chip "upgrade" do for the Paragon
I?
>
>The Geihl chip is a significant upgrade to the original user interface.
Some of
>the major improvements are: RIT, XIT (both +/- 99khz), clock, main display,
>band and frequency (up/down 5 and 10khz) changing. Some of these features I
>miss in the Omni 6+.
>
>> Can the Paragon I run cascaded optional filters like the Omni VI?
>
>No. The Omni V was the first TenTec radio to provide for optional 9Mhz IF
>filters. The Paragon uses the standard 2.4khz filters in both the first and
>second (6Mhz/PBT) IF and provides for the optional 3 filters in the PBT IF.
>
>>
>>
>> Lane
>> Ku7i
>
>Greg, K7KJPortland, OR
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
>> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>> Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|