Wow!!! That sounds like one heck of a lot of work just to
be able to go hf mobile!!!!
Something wrong with the 555 or ft-100??
It is, after all, just mobile hf'ing. It just ain't that serious!
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Mike Pender N9IVO: Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
E-Mail: steam@megsinet.net
Web Page: : http://www.megsinet.com/~steam
Fax: 708-795-7003
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
I know that I will have a tiny tiny
> control box that will control my future Pegasus in my mobile. A tiny
> microcomputer will be inside the box to do the work. It will not have a
> screen at all! As a mobile operator it is likely better that I do not
look
> at a screen, I am sure that my vehicle insurance company will agree. My
> frequency readout will be by CW! I will tune with a few buttons, spaced
> optimally for my stiff fingers. I will push two of the buttons together
> and I will then be able to adjust the audio level, I will push two other
> tuning buttons together and I will change the CW sending speed. What I am
> sharing with you is that my CW mobile setup will be to meet my needs, done
> the way I want it done. This is the real value potential of virtual
> radios.
>
> 73
>
> Larry, VA3LK / WA3ZIA
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|