What about it didn't you understand?
"M.Pender" <steam@megsinet.net> on 05/02/99 12:35:11 PM
To: Bill Ames@Hyperion
cc:
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Dell/Gateway comparison
What exactly, does all that dribble have to do with anything?
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Mike Pender N9IVO: Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
E-Mail: steam@megsinet.net
Web Page: : http://www.megsinet.com/~steam
Fax: 708-795-7003
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill_Ames@hyperion.com <Bill_Ames@hyperion.com>
To: M.Pender <steam@megsinet.net>
Cc: tentec@contesting.com <tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sunday, May 02, 1999 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Dell/Gateway comparison
>
>
>If they sold as many ham rigs as they do computers (now wouldn't that cause
a
>bit of QRM!) then we could have something like the Omni for $800 and like
the
>Scout for $200. But, you would also be able to buy something for $1800 that
>would be state of the art and out perform any rig older then 2 years. It
would
>combine a computer, voice recognition, connection to the internet, ARRL
>connection for valid QSL's, logging capabilities, propagation prediction
>software, ability to run by itself to contact others like it (while you are
in
>the QTH as control operator), works all modes and all bands, has very few
>switches because it knows how to provide the best signal going out and get
the
>most out of what is coming in, can be configured to replicate the
functional
>capability of any previously existing rig By displaying their controls on
the
>monitor) so you could operate it just as you remembered (performance would
match
>the chosen rig), did I miss anything?
>
>
>Bill Ames
>KB1LG
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|