To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] TenTec/ Harley |
From: | geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.) |
Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 1999 11:08:45 -0500 |
I disagree that Collins mechanical filters are better. They are NOT better for the real world with static and rapid time noise. They are super for radio interference rejection and have a terrible time response. The will ring for long enough that line noise is not heard through them as a buzz, just as a greatly raised white noise level. On a scope the filter ringing stays there to fill in the gaps between arcs that happen every 1/360th cycle (from a three phase power line). The output of a Collins filter from lighting static is a CRASHHH that goes on and on. The output of a Tentec filter is a click... There is a difference and Tentec does it better than Collins. I have both. And nearly all the rest of the world's crystal filters emulate both the frequency and time responses of the Collins filter (with emphasis on shape factor, neglecting time response) so users of those filters in rice boxes have to quit radioing when there's a bit of static because all they hear is extended crashes while Tentec users hear only clicks from lightning static. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] TenTec/ Harley, Bill_Ames@hyperion.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Walt wins!!!, Larry Kayser |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] TenTec/ Harley, Walter S Delesandri |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] TenTec/ Harley, Steve Ellington |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |