>On Fri, 12 Mar 1999 12:51:32 -0500 "Alex Mendelsohn"
><alex.ai2q@worldnet.att.net> writes:
>>Hi Joe:
>>
>>That's a good point. Why don't we simply run a ten Tec net on
CW, say
>>at
>>14045 kHz, for example?
>
We don't need no stinkin' nets!! :-) --that's a joke, Jay--
Just use 14045 as a Ten-Tec calling frequency. I'd just as soon
drop my dozen or more CQ's on 14045 as any other frequency on my
way to/from work every day. And if it's going to net a few more
than usual QSO's with Ten-Tec users, so much the better.
But, don't make it a NET....I'll never remember or make the
schedule--witness my activity on the SSB net (zero)...I have the
time and QRG posted above my Omni VI+ and still miss the
thing....sorry, Jay.
73,
dale, kg5u
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|