To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Re: Popular Communications slant and position |
From: | kayser@rideau.net (Larry Kayser) |
Date: | Fri, 05 Feb 1999 08:54:53 -0500 |
Greetings: I thought that Re: Popular Communications was a Cowan Publication. If it is a Cowan Publication is it not then a bottom feeder of the bottom feeders of amateur radio that is the CQ lineage? As a bottom feeder should we expect anything different from them! Larry VA3LK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment, AB4KX@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment, James Parsons |
Previous by Thread: | Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment, AB4KX@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: Popular Communications slant and position, seweber@netnitco.net |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |