| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Re: INRAD vs. TenTec - Yes Please |
| From: | turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner) |
| Date: | Sat, 05 Dec 1998 10:32:13 -0800 |
The INRAD CW filters are all 8 pole filters. The Ten Tec filters are 8 pole for the 9 MHz IF with 500 Hz bandwidth (217?) but all the other CW filters for 9 or 6.3 MHz IF are 6 pole filters (282, 285). This may account for the steeper skirts, but the lower loss is something I don't really understand...but I like it. Clark WA3JPG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Re: INRAD vs. TenTec - Yes Please, <dx@netbridge.net (John & Annette Nicholson) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] WTB: 282 CW Filter (250hz), <timcook@erinet.com (Tim Cook) |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: INRAD vs. TenTec - Yes Please, <dx@netbridge.net (John & Annette Nicholson) |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] qrp kit 1340 ?, Michael Melland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |