--------------62518D7D5852D2B77F64D1B4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
HI to all,
so it should start again, as I see.
I posted the results thinking they have to appear on this stage
as some of "haapies" would want to show my inconsistency.
We were talking about ten-tec - what it produces, how it does it
and how they treat their customers. I should have add,
and what we, putting some knowledge and work into the device,
might get out of it. But, be realistic, you'll never get any
substantial help from the original manufacturer.
I don't know why we shouldn't do that on this reflector.
It's as good a forum as any other. Whatever is the outcome,
it may give some extra thought to everybody.
And it's well where this reflector should be focused at.
Besides.
I'm not happy with the results.
With some rig really being working properly, I would have
doubled the final score, AT LEAST.
See you all..
Stay happy, but still, remember, think twice,
before you start reading ten-tec commercials.
Learn from the mistakes committed by others.
It's a part of a universal wisdom, guys...
Alec/SP2EWQ
Chris Robson wrote:
> Being the rotten, no good, SOB that I am, I could not resist. I see
> that
> Alex's Paragon that is a piece of S*** had a pretty respectable
> contest
> score in CQWW. What's Wrong with this picture?
>
> CQ WORLD WIDE DX CONTEST -- 1998
>
> Call: SP2EWQ Country: Poland
> Mode: CW Category: Single Operator Low
> Power
>
> BAND QSO QSO PTS PTS/QSO ZONES COUNTRIES
>
> 160 213 245 1.15 11 50
> 80 289 391 1.35 15 62
> 40 259 468 1.81 19 66
> 20 219 400 1.83 18 63
> 15 267 632 2.37 23 72
> 10 81 184 2.27 21 44
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Totals 1328 2320 1.75 107 357 => 1,076,480
>
> All reports sent were 59(9), unless otherwise noted.
>
> Equipment Description: Paragon 585-100W. Zepp+ATU.
>
> Food for thought.(sorry for this post,this whole subject has pushed me
> over
> the edge.
>
> Chris KB3A
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--------------62518D7D5852D2B77F64D1B4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
<P>HI to all,
<P>so it should start again, as I see.
<BR>I posted the results thinking they have to appear on this stage
<BR>as some of "haapies" would want to show my inconsistency.
<P><B>We were talking about ten-tec - what it produces, how it does it</B>
<BR><B>and how they treat their customers. I should have add,</B>
<BR><B>and what we, putting some knowledge and work into the device,</B>
<BR><B>might get out of it. But, be realistic, you'll never get any</B>
<BR><B>substantial help from the original manufacturer.</B>
<BR><B> I don't know why we shouldn't do that on this
reflector.</B>
<BR><B>It's as good a forum as any other. Whatever is the outcome,</B>
<BR><B>it may give some extra thought to everybody.</B>
<BR><B> And it's well where this reflector should be
focused at.</B><B></B>
<P><B>Besides.</B>
<BR><B>I'm not happy with the results.</B>
<BR><B>With some rig really being working properly, I would have</B>
<BR><B>doubled the final score, AT LEAST.</B><B></B>
<P><B>See you all..</B>
<BR><B>Stay happy, but still, remember, think twice,</B>
<BR><B>before you start reading ten-tec commercials.</B><B></B>
<P><B>Learn from the mistakes committed by others.</B>
<BR><B>It's a part of a universal wisdom, guys...</B><B></B>
<P><B>Alec/SP2EWQ</B>
<BR><B></B>
<BR><B></B> <B><FONT SIZE=+1></FONT></B>
<P>Chris Robson wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>Being the rotten, no good, SOB that I am, I could
not resist. I see that
<BR>Alex's Paragon that is a piece of S*** had a pretty respectable contest
<BR>score in CQWW. What's Wrong with this picture?
<P>
CQ WORLD WIDE DX CONTEST -- 1998
<P> Call:
SP2EWQ
Country: Poland
<BR> Mode:
CW
Category: Single Operator Low Power
<P> BAND QSO
QSO PTS PTS/QSO ZONES COUNTRIES
<P> 160
213
245 1.15
11
50
<BR> 80
289 391
1.35
15 62
<BR> 40
259 468
1.81
19 66
<BR> 20
219 400
1.83
18 63
<BR> 15
267 632
2.37
23 72
<BR> 10
81 184
2.27
21 44
<BR> ---------------------------------------------------
<P> Totals 1328
2320 1.75 107
357 => 1,076,480
<P>All reports sent were 59(9), unless otherwise noted.
<P>Equipment Description: Paragon 585-100W. Zepp+ATU.
<P>Food for thought.(sorry for this post,this whole subject has pushed
me over
<BR>the edge.
<P>Chris KB3A
<P>--
<BR>FAQ on
WWW:
<A
HREF="http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm";>http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm</A>
<BR>Submissions:
tentec@contesting.com
<BR>Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
<BR>Problems:
owner-tentec@contesting.com
<BR>Search:
<A
HREF="http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm";>http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm</A></BLOCKQUOTE>
</HTML>
--------------62518D7D5852D2B77F64D1B4--
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|