TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] (no subject)

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] (no subject)
From: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 10:32:00 -0700
My computer at home is a 66 MHz 486 DX/2 (this, and I work for the 
company that makes the 400 MHz Pentium II!), and I have not experienced 
any slowness of Ten Tec's website when compared to most others.

Reid, K7YX
Intel Oregon

BTW at work my computer is the latest Intel technology.  I guess being a 
Ham I'm too cheap to upgrade my home computer! <:-)


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)
Author:  "Joseph T. Price-O'Brien" [SMTP:pob@vt.edu] at MSXGATE
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date:    5/13/98 10:13 AM


Bill_Ames@hysoft.com wrote:

> ...using my T1 access and an HP Kayak workstation running at 260 mhz 
> under NT 4.0, they were the sloooow ones <g>

Big deal.  Cut out the complaining.  Do something useful.  <grimace>

OBIE, WA4DOX...
--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm 
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com 
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm 
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com 
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>