Well, personally, I think it's darn well time Wall Street know about Ten-Tec
and how their gear performed during CQ WW!! I know for a fact that my Omni
VI+ was absolutely outstanding in it's performance and ease/comfort of use.
CQ WW CW was the first REAL DX competition since it's upgrade. While I had
played with the NR and filters before, that's just what it was: playing. In
the contest, the NR really came into it's own and I learned how to use it.
I know for a fact that it made the difference between QSO and no-QSO in more
than a couple of cases.
So, Jim, consider it a matter of enlightening the uninformed. Who knows,
maybe the fallout will be a public offering of Ten-Tec stock! Who among us
would NOT jump at that? (be advised: I am just writing off the top of my
head here...I don't have a paper to see if T-T is listed on any
exchange....is it??)
73,
Dale Martin, KG5U
kg5u@hal-pc.org
http://www.hal-pc.org/~kg5u
-----Original Message-----
From: JAMES T BRANNIGAN <FSWF37A@prodigy.com>
To: tentec@contesting.com <tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Saturday, December 06, 1997 5:47 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Mea Culpa
>I apologize to the list for an inadvertent posting...
>
>
>My other post ,meant for the TT reflector,
>praising the OMNI-VI + as a great performer in the CQWW CW contest,
>brought many strange responses from the Wall Street mail list......
>
>Jim WB2TPS
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|