Hi Ron,
I didn't reply to your original question although I remember it. I just
wanted to put in my two cents worth before you decided what to do. I have
an Omni-VI plus and I am a serious CW operator. I have both 250Hz And
500hz filters in my two narrow positions. If I select both 500Hz filters
there is a noticeable but small improvement over just one. When I select
both 250hz filters there is a big improvement over just one. When I had
the OMNI-VI with only one Narrow position,
I used the 250Hz filter in that position although I owned both the 250 and
500. I found the extra 250Hz was much more useful on 160, 80, and 40 in
particular. On 160, 80 and 40, I operate most of the time with both 250Hz
filters and the NR and LP buttons selected.
73,
Ken W7TS
Ken Kinyon
34 Princeton Circle
Longmont, CO 80503-2106
Voice/FAX (303) 684-0037
Email W7TS@concentric.net
----------
> From: K5PN@aol.com
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] Thanks for Info
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 8:57
>
> What a great batch of responses I received for all my OMNI V
> questions...Thanks to all of you......
>
> The consensus for adding the NAR filter was not even a contest.....Sounds
> like the 500hz(#217) is what I must add immediately..........Got one?
Reply
> here or to
> rchambers@aguirre.com........
>
> See y'all in SS/CW and CQWW/CW...............Ron/K5PN
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|