To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (fwd) |
From: | moore@moore.sr.unh.edu (Andrew M. Moore) |
Date: | Tue, 13 Aug 1996 16:49:09 -0400 (EDT) |
> For the problems listed, discussions with engineers or even the marketing > types were not needed ... the BASIC operational features were present. ... > mine and many others. That is the point. I didn't realize the problems were so widely known, and I apologize if my own bias took over. It's difficult for me to be objective in a discussion about a product with which I'm so happy. Andrew M. Moore NV1B, CFO #963 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP, C. J. Hawley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Summary of Comments OmniVi vs FT1000MP, John L. Merrill |
Previous by Thread: | Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (fwd), Andrew M. Moore |
Next by Thread: | Summary of Comments OmniVi vs FT1000MP, John L. Merrill |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |