TRLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Trlog] CQ160 and version 6.93

To: "'Tree'" <tree@kkn.net>
Subject: Re: [Trlog] CQ160 and version 6.93
From: "Mike Wetzel" <mjwetzel@comcast.net>
Reply-to: mjwetzel@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:38:34 -0500
List-post: <trlog@contesting.com">mailto:trlog@contesting.com>
I am using "smartdrv" although I'm not 100% sure I have it set up perfectly.
I am working on this aspect.

I tried versions 6.88/6.79, 6.90, 6.92 and 6.93 and with a log of 500 q's
the delays are approximately 1 sec (6.88/6.79), 2 sec (6.90 and 6.92 and 3
seconds for 6.93.  Delay was not noticeable until several hundred q's were
in the log.

The time delay is after entering a call and hitting 'enter' until the cursor
shows up in the exchange field.

Mike W9RE

-----Original Message-----
From: Tree [mailto:tree@kkn.net] 
Sent: February 28, 2009 4:16 PM
To: Mike Wetzel
Cc: 'TRLog Reflector'
Subject: Re: [Trlog] CQ160 and version 6.93

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:15:06PM -0500, Mike Wetzel wrote:

> Using 6.93 my computer really seems to be a lot slower.  After I hit the
> return to log the call things stand still for a second or so and I am not
> able to see if the section is there before I type it in.  Anyone else
seeing
> this slowness or is it just me?

Are you using a disk cache?

Tree

_______________________________________________
Trlog mailing list
Trlog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>