On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 06:58:54AM -0500, Jim George N3BB wrote:
> The need to do the "RESCORE" capability of TR is pretty lame!
The TR RESCORE feature is just an automated way to do a TR READ command.
As such it makes doing a TR READ very easy to do as it does all the
setup steps for you.
I have been using TR READ or TR RESCORE on logs for years now.
I almost always do this as it is an easy way to find really
broken stuff in the log and it also makes sure I know how
many points I have by 'relogging' all of the contacts a second time.
> the procedure per K5TR's email. It worked OK, and the "rate" at 99 WPM etc
> was about 1100 QSO/hour. At that rate it was going to take over an hour
> and a half with my 1800+ QSO log. The little 486DX DOS SO2R PC was writing
> furiously to its disk drive, etc. I gave it up after about 20% of the way
> thru and said to myself "this isn't worth it."
I am not sure what you mean - it is not like you have to do any work.
This is one thing that computers are good at - doing work for you.
If it takes longer than you want to watch it - just let it run - go
eat dinner, mow the lawn, watch TV etc. It is not like you are
wasting your time by letting the computer run.
A faster computer, faster disk and running a disk cache like SMARTDRIVE
will speed up this process. In fact running the disk cache might help
the most.
Are you running SMARTDRIVE on this computer?
--
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
_______________________________________________
Trlog mailing list
Trlog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
|