TRLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[TRLog] CW increment

Subject: [TRLog] CW increment
From: w0yk@msn.com (J. Edward (Ed) Muns)
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:31:13 -0800
Hmmm.  At first, I thought a fixed increment of 3 wpm was restrictive ...
until I used it a bit.  Now, I think it is perfect.  If I had a
user-specified increment, I'd choose 3 wpm!  I've never run into any
situation where I needed more granularity than that and with several key
presses I can quickly get the speed way down for slow callers, and then
right back to my normal speed afterward.  By ear, 3 wpm seems about right
for a step up or down in speed to me.

Guess we all have opinions and preferences!

73,
Ed - W0YK


> -----Original Message-----
> From: trlog-admin@contesting.com [mailto:trlog-admin@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of Paul Beringer
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:22 PM
> To: TRlog reflector
> Cc: mark@concertart.com
> Subject: [TRLog] CW increment
>
>
> To quote Mark, N5OT, "....is the ability to specify in the CFG
> file the WPM
> increment when you do a pageup/dn to change speed.  I find myself
> constantly
> Alt-S-plus-two-digits to fine tune the speed I want to go.  Seems to me a
> user-specifyable increment, which defaults to 3, would make my
> life easier."
>
> I would have to agree. I also use Alt-S-plus-two-digits to get the speed I
> want very often. And no, Mark, you're not the only one. There are at least
> two of us :)
> Paul NG7Z
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 11/25/2002
>
> _______________________________________________
> TRLog mailing list
> TRLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>