Subject: | [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT |
---|---|
From: | geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR) |
Date: | Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:31:56 -0800 |
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:26:28PM -0400, Mike Gilmer, N2MG wrote: > Having read about the difference between using INPUT CONFIG FILE vs > STDCFG.DAT, I cannot see the reason why anyone would want to use INPUT > CONFIG FILE setting. > > What kind of config info is the INPUT CONFIG FILE setting best used for? The INPUT CONFIG FILE was used before there was a feature that used the STDCFG.DAT file. -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Mike Gilmer, N2MG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TRLog] Daily logger, WD4K |
Previous by Thread: | [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Mike Gilmer, N2MG |
Next by Thread: | [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Jim Smith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |