On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:19:15PM -0400, LogWindows@aol.com wrote:
> Since it would take $100,000 - $150,000 to develop this product correctly and
> the market seems to be saying they wouldn't embrace a Windows version of
> TRLog, I've decided at this time not to begin the development of the product.
> I will however, continue to watch the TRLog reflector for a time that may be
> more 'ripe' for a Windows contesting program, that would be the best product
> for it's market.
So, besides the TR Log reflector, where was the survey advertised?
Are you assuming that the market for a TRLog for Windows would be the same
set of hams that currently use TR Log for DOS and are into it so much that
they hang out on the reflector?
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth E. Harker "Vox Clamantis in Deserto" kharker@cs.utexas.edu
University of Texas at Austin Amateur Radio Callsign: WM5R
Department of the Computer Sciences President, UT Amateur Radio Club
Taylor Hall TAY 2.124 Maintainer of Linux on Laptops
Austin, TX 78712-1188 USA http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|