SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] NAQP SSB NJ8J Single Op LP

Subject: [SECC] NAQP SSB NJ8J Single Op LP
From: knason00 at gmail.com (Kevan Nason)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:03:56 -0400
Ben (and Charlie)

Don't know for sure, but if you both heard it around the same time maybe it
was an over-the-horizon radar? Heard Iran, China and now Russia have
reactivated them. Heard them during the contest.

Example of some are at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knPQ9Ek1BOc


Kevan
N4XL


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:01 AM, AA4CF <aa4cf at comcast.net> wrote:

> Ben, I remember high QRN around the same time, to me the conditions seemed
> to go in and out on 15m and 20m
>
> Charlie
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 17, 2014, at 5:14 PM, Ben Coleman <nj8j at benshome.net> wrote:
> >
> >                    North American QSO Party, SSB - August
> >
> > Call: NJ8J
> > Operator(s): NJ8J
> > Station: NJ8J
> >
> > Class: Single Op LP
> > QTH: GA
> > Operating Time (hrs): 9:34
> >
> > Summary:
> > Band  QSOs  Mults
> > -------------------
> >  160:    1     1
> >   80:   57    21
> >   40:  114    38
> >   20:   25    14
> >   15:   37     6
> >   10:
> > -------------------
> > Total:  234    80  Total Score = 18,720
> >
> > Club: South East Contest Club
> >
> > Team: SECC
> >
> > Comments:
> > Equipment:
> > Alinco DX-77T
> > LDG AT-11MP Automatic Antenna tuner
> >
> > Antennas:
> > 100' OCF Dipole fed with ladder-line
> >
> > Logger: N1MM
> >
> > Probably my best August NAQP SSB, mainly because I haven't done that
> > many of them.  I didn't realize how many I had missed until I looked it
> > up to compare.  Still far from my Jan NAQP SSB 2001 entry, and not
> > nearly as fun as the recent NAQP CW.
> >
> > Never heard anything on 10.  15 and 20 weren't that great.  Main
> > difference between 15 and 20 was that on 15 you could hear plenty of
> > loud signals (just not enough of them), while on 20 just about everyone
> > was down in the mud.  The contest didn't become fun until I dropped down
> > to 40.  I had rates above 60 on the initial sweep through 40, and even
> > managed to run for a short while.  Ditto on 80.  80 seemed to die in the
> > last hour.  I wasted a half hour in the last hour on 80 when I should
> > have jumped back to 40.
> >
> > Did this with the rig's standard hand mike, which means a lot of setting
> > it down to type on the keyboard and picking it back up to transmit,
> > which can get clumsy at times.  At one point, I thought W100AW/4 had
> > taken my run frequency on 40.  Realized shortly after that apparently I
> > had accidently hit the UP button on the hand mike, moving me up 100Khz
> > and right onto *his* frequency. Managed to work him, though I had to ask
> > for his call (which must have been amusing).  After that I made sure
> > that I didn't leave the select marker in the 100KHz position.  I've got
> > a headset/mike with a foot-pedal switch, but the cable has a break in
> > it.  I need to fix that before my next serious SSB
> > contest.
> >
> > Around 2130Z I started getting an S9 noise level.  That's dinner time,
> > so I figured it was probably a neighbor running a mixer or something
> > similar while making dinner.  I took a break at that point, and was out
> > a bit long, which is why I didn't quite make it to 10 hours.
> >
> > Ben
> > --
> > Ben Coleman nj8j at benshome.net
> > "I love the way Microsoft follows standards.  In much the
> > same manner that fish follow migrating caribou."
> >                                            Paul Tomblin
> > _______________________________________________
> > SECC mailing list
> > SECC at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20140818/b9a8bd3f/attachment.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>