SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] US qso's

Subject: [SECC] US qso's
From: halken at comcast.net (Hal Kennedy)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:27:33 -0500
I could not agree more with Lee.  I won't mention the call of the zone 5
station I worked that I was certain after listening carefully to the way
the exchange was handled I was not in their log.  So I had to work
another one.  This happens a lot in this contest for reasons Ill never
understand - why not log it if you took the time to work it?

Hal N4GG
  

-----Original Message-----
From: secc-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:secc-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Lee Hiers
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 5:09 PM
To: Courtney Judd K4WI
Cc: ACG; SECC
Subject: Re: [SECC] US qso's

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Courtney Judd K4WI <k4wi at earthlink.net>
wrote:

> Anyone else interested in this...
> should CQ change the rules for no pointers?

No, but the US stations that work other US stations and don't log them
should be DQ'd.  IMO.

-- 
Lee Hiers
"Have Dobro Will Travel"
_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>