Thanks, Hal. Taking your advice I have about 10 matches without the
/140 and the original 1 match with. It seems that ARRL didn't do a good
job putting out correct guidelines for the use of their own tool?
Anyone else notice that as the event went on, many of the /140's seems
most interested in working each other?
Anyway, it was a lot of fun...and some of the 140's were very, very good
op's.
From: Hal Kennedy [mailto:halken at comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:24 AM
To: Robert Gerace
Subject: RE: [SECC] ARRL /140 Event Logging on LoTW?
I would resend them without the /140 and see what happens. Nothing to
loose. Those fellows would have had to get a separate /140 certificate
for their additional callsign - maybe they didn't bother...
Hal N4GG
-----Original Message-----
From: secc-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:secc-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Robert Gerace
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:28 PM
To: secc at contesting.com
Subject: [SECC] ARRL /140 Event Logging on LoTW?
I've logged over 25 contacts for the event, and uploaded all to LoTW.
Only one has matched up.
I've logged them as CALL/140 and the one match was CALL/140.
I'm confused, though, because I would think an ARRL event would log to
LoTW, but 1 in 25 seems pretty low.
So, all this to ask, is there a 'correct' way to log the contacts to
LoTW? Would relogging them without the /140 work?
Thanks
73 de N3FY, Bob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/private/secc/attachments/20090909/eeffa2a5/attachment.html
|