SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Rules Change for GQP 2006

Subject: [SECC] Rules Change for GQP 2006
From: halken at comcast.net (Hal Kennedy)
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:54:24 -0400
John -

This is a good catch - I support your suggestion.  Now if I could just find
a giant station that I could remote control - maybe I could pick my scores
up some!

While we are tuning the GQP rules, lets expressly prohibit self-spotting.

N4GG made it back on the air as of yesterday - but its one small dipole, one
rig and one amp.  It may be a while before we are back to full capability.

73
Hal
N4GG


-----Original Message-----
From: secc-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:secc-bounces at contesting.com]On
Behalf Of John Laney
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:47 AM
To: secc; Paul Newberry; Jeff Clarke
Subject: [SECC] Rules Change for GQP 2006


I think we should include a rule like the KY QSO Party has.  More and
more stations are using remote transmitters.  There has been some
discussion on cq-contest and it doesn't seem that it is yet clear to
everyone that the section sent should be the location of the
transmitter/antenna and not necessarily the location of the operator.
KY had a rule that expressly addressed it with an illustration:  the
operator is in one state and he uses a remote transceiver antenna in
another.  He competes and sends the exchange of the transciever/antenna
location.

73,


John, K4BAI.

_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>