I think the Feb Sprints alternate modes every year. Next year the CW sprint
will be the first weekend and SSB the second.
Still doesn't solve the problem.
Greg K4NO
----- Original Message -----
From: "Schulz Jonathan" <jonathan.schulz@siemens.com>
To: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Cc: <secc@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 6:30 PM
Subject: [SECC] RE: [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM
> CW Sprint was moved last year because of Valentine's day, if it is such an
> issue, propose to move it again
>
> CQWW WPX RTTY is hardly a "new" contest?
>
> 73
> Jon
> K9JS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ku8e@bellsouth.net [mailto:ku8e@bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 9:03 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Cc: secc@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM
>
>
>
> I couldn't help but notice there is another RTTY contest - CQ WW RTTY
WPX
> Contest (0000Z, Feb 12 to 2400Z, Feb 13 ) scheduled next weekend. The NA
CW
> Sprint, which is a very popular contest in
> the USA is scheduled 0000-0400z on Saturday night. How about you RTTY
guys
> cutting us some slack and don't call CQ low in the band on 40 meters
during
> the 4 hours the Sprint is going on. The NAQP CW contest back in January
> conflicted with another RTTY contest and the RTTY QRM made the band almost
> useless.
>
> I understand that recently RTTY has become a popular mode , but the NA
> Sprints have been around
> for almost 30 years on this exact weekend. The sponsors of all the new
RTTY
> contests should take this into consideration when picking a date for their
> contest. Thanks for your consideration...
>
>
> Jeff KU8E
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
|