SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Re: NAQP team

Subject: [SECC] Re: NAQP team
From: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Tue Jul 13 19:22:26 2004
Tom,

I'm sorry that you're frustrated with the NAQP team effort.  I 
appreciate your attempt to set up a team and am disappointed that it 
didn't turn out to your satisfaction.

That said, it appears to me that there has been confusion and perhaps 
misunderstanding on a couple of points.

First of all, it was my understanding that you solicited ideas for team 
names; as well as asked for our input on the ones that had been 
suggested.  From your comment below, it would appear that those who 
expressed opinions regarding the team names, myself included, caused you 
frustration and harassment.  If that's the case, all I can say is that I 
was only attempting to provide the feedback that had been solicited.

Secondly, while it is difficult to read context and inflection into an 
e-mail, it appears to me that Ed was doing nothing more than attempting 
to step aside in favor of K4AQ.  I don't believe that he was suggesting 
anything other than a gentlemanly alternative to the solution that you 
had made.

In any event, I hope you do well in the NAQP and I hope to work you on 
at least a couple of bands.

73,

Kent, AE4Y


Tom Moore wrote:
> Obviously I have not even come close to satisfying those who might like
> to participate on a SECC NAQP RTTY team... from nr of team members or
> those who had opinions  about the team name. I don't need this kind of
> frustration or harassment. I was just looking to have a little bit of
> fun and to get more SECC folks involved. I solicited, solicited and
> resolicited participation and involvement and the below is typical of
> what I got. I just don't need this folks.  Sorry to have bugged ya.
> Won't happen again I assure you.
> 
> Oh, somebody else can pick up the NAQP RTTY Team thing if desired; I
> won't be participating on any team.
> 
> Tom WX4TM
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "K4SB" <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
> To: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
> Cc: "SECC" <secc@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [SECC] Re: NAQP team
> 
> 
> 
>>Tom Moore wrote:
>>
>>>OOOPS! Ok, according to the official NAQP team entry form, we're
> 
> limited
> 
>>>to 5 members per team. We had six folks sign up to be on our SECC
> 
> team.
> 
>>>So in fairness to all, unless we can get four more to sign up very
>>>quickly, I had to drop off the last entry, K4AQ. Thanks for your
> 
> support
> 
>>>and willingness to participate.
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------
>>No, this is wrong. If we cannot get 4 more members to sign up, I will
>>withdraw and allow K4AQ to take my place.
>>
>>I note that many people in the club who operate RTTY are missing from
>>the list. There is nothing in the rules which says you have to
>>operate, only that you have to be on a team.
>>
>>This withdrawal is effective immediately.
>>
>>73
>>Ed
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>