Larry,
I'm not sure of my TR version. However, I took out a dupe QSO by hand,
then recalculated my score using the mult bonuses and the score originally
calculated by TR was correct.
I sent in my log to DARC in Cabrillo format and received a robot answer
saying everything is OK. I actually sent the log, plus the TR file of
QTCs, plus the summary sheet. The DARC website says "We can read most of
the popular file formats." I think that would include Cabrillo.
I'll let you know if I hear anything further from DARC.
73,
Jay/K4OGG
At 05:53 PM 8/12/2002, Larry Crim wrote:
>Jay, et all...
>
>
>Did you use the latest version of TR for WAE?...I see a lot of guys
>under-reporting
>their MULT totals on 3830. I know there are multiplier bonuses...i.e. 4X
>on 80,
>3X on 40 and 2X on 20/25/10.
>
>My "latest" version of CT gives me 181 mults...even though I only worked
>70 countries.
>
>Am I missing something or are all these guys missing some easy points because
>they are using old software.
>
>And, I don't think DARC uses Carbillo, which would automatically score the
>logs.
>
>
>Anyone?
>
>-Larry K4AB
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Jay Pryor
>Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:14
>To: SECC@contesting.com
>Subject: [SECC] K4OGG, WAE-CW
>
>K4OGG -- Single Op, Low Power, No packet
>
>I'm sure it's my age speaking, but I certainly do like the 36-hour format
>for single ops! Following a couple of naps I felt better on Sunday than I
>did on Saturday. This is a fun contest and deserves more participation.
>
>This was an interesting contest because of the conditions, which changed
>throughout the contest period. There was a nice opening to Europe early
>Saturday. My best rates of the entire contest were 62 at 0600Z, 52 at
>0700Z, and 63 at 0800Z on 20M. But then on Sunday morning at the same time
>period the opening was just not there. Also, on 15M I had 20 QSOs the
>entire first 24 hours -- and finished with 159, so 15M fortunately opened
>enough to make it more interesting on Sunday. Speaking of 15M on Sunday,
>K4BAI and I were leap-frogging each other up and down the band. I also
>heard K4AB several times. 80 and 40 were noisy but what the heck, it's
>August. It helped a great deal to use the beverage on those bands.
>
>Didn't hear any EU on 10M, but I heard a couple of SA stations working
>them. In fact it seemed that every time I checked the band a SA station
>was sending QTCs.
>
>I continue to be impressed at how well TRLog handles the QTC function.
>
>Here's the bottom line:
>
> BAND Raw QSOs Valid QSOs Points Countries
> ______________________________________________________
>
> 80CW 12 12 12 9
> 40CW 127 127 127 26
> 20CW 475 475 475 39
> 15CW 159 159 159 33
> ______________________________________________________
>
> Totals 773 773 773 107
>
>
> There were 773 QTC points.
>
> Final Score = 398868 points.
>
>FWIW, this will go down by one QSO. One station that I showed as a dupe
>insisted that we QSO a second time.
>
>
>73,
>
>- Jay/K4OGG
>
>
>--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
>---
>_______________________________________________
>SECC mailing list
>SECC@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
>
>--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
>---
>_______________________________________________
>SECC mailing list
>SECC@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
|