Mike,
The new layout looks great! I really like the logos at the top. Again,
thanks for your work on the site.
73,
Jay/K4OGG
At 10:39 PM 10/18/2001, Michael Condon wrote:
>Yep,
>It is done, and the GQP results are on the new page. See
>http://gqp.contesting.com for new layout and results for this year and prior
>two years. That was done a couple weeks ago, and a note was sent out. I
>think I said we could release the "P" and certificate guys then.
>The only residual for me is a few requests for mailed results, and getting
>about $20 in donations received to Nancy for the treasury. I also want to
>spiff up the new site, and remove most of the duplicated material from the
>SECC site regarding GQP. I have had a couple of queries about GQP links on
>the web, and have put out the new URL. I will probably go through a more
>serious effort later this year, early next, to get a lot of links on other
>sites fixed, and even solicit link listings for GQP.
>I also promised to make a GQP logging program for use next time. That was
>not an idle threat; my Rover logger is just now going out to a few hardy
>folks for "Beta" now. Rover/GQP will be a subset of Rover.
>I have also put together a listing of recommendations, ruminations, and even
>funny comments about changes to GQP. After adding my observations, I will
>forward it all to the club officers for possible use in a round of work and
>discussion on changes for GQP. (That email reminder note like CQP did is a
>lay-up from the current DB)
>But, all that is follow up work. Some of that work will have to be handed
>off to a new web tender next year, as I must opt out after March next year.
>So onward and upward.
>
>73, Mike, NE4S
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-secc@contesting.com [mailto:owner-secc@contesting.com]On Behalf
>Of Gary Breed
>Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:34 PM
>To: secc@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP 2001 Results
>
>John, Mike and all...
>
>I looked over the results when Mike first posted them to the new
>gqp.contesting.com Web site. Then Mike found one more little
>snafu and fixed. I can only assume that GQP is done and the world
>can see the results. I think Mike copied Jere on the final fixes to the
>scores, but not 100% sure.
>
>John K4BAI, would you post this to cq-contest? I am not a
>subscriber (an archive reader) and can't be sure they'll accept a post
>from me. Thanks!
>
>73, Gary
>K9AY
>
>
> > The last I heard, the results had been posted on our webpage, but the
> > officers were to review them and advise if they could be released
> > further. I plan to put a note to the cq-contest reflector and the SEDXC
> > reflector about their availability when I have been given the OK to do
> > so.
> >
> > I believe Jere needs to have the go ahead for the certificates, Jay for
> > the plaques, and someone needs to send the results to participants who
> > don't get them by e-mail. One year, Jere included the results with the
> > certificates. I don't think he did so last year and not everyone gets a
> > certificate. But they need to get a copy of the results to encourage
> > them to enter again.
> >
> > I guess it would be possible to check the calls of the logs received in
> > QRZ and send out some kind of a message about the availability of the
> > results via e-mail and then someone could mail a copy to anyone not in
> > QRZ or Buckmaster with an e-mail address and to those whose addresses
> > turn out not to be good in those sources. What do you think we should
> > do in that regard?
> >
> > Mike, as I have mentioned before, I cannot seem to print a complete copy
> > of the results. The right side of the results runs off the paper. I
> > get a big blank side on the left due to the SECC logo at the top. But,
> > I can't seem to get the printer to do it any other way. If you don't
> > have an idea about how I can print my own copy, could you print a copy
> > and bring it to NQ4I for me next weekend?
> >
> > I did the Ala QSO Party with a borrowed mobile at the end of Sept and
> > had a ball in spite of there not being as much activity as in the GQP.
> > This is definitely the way to have real fun in GQP.
> >
> > Mike, did you ever get a report as to how close we came to having
> > activity from all 159 counties? Maybe we could set a line at whatever
> > the total was this year and try to improve that in the future.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > John, K4BAI.
> >
> > --
> > SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
> > Submissions: secc@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
> >
>
>
>--
>SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
>Submissions: secc@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
>
>
>--
>SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
>Submissions: secc@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
--
SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions: secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
|